Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:20

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Street Dog Who Fought to Survive by Eating Rocks and Dirt Has Us in Tears - PetHelpful
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Blue Jackets acquire forwards Charlie Coyle and Miles Wood from Colorado - NHL.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Is it mandatory for restaurants to wash glasses after every use?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Is it true that most women like alpha males?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What was your biggest culture shock going to Europe?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Magic Johnson Bluntly Blames Two Players for Knicks' Season-Ending Loss - Sports Illustrated
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.